Pretrained Models Results¶
This page reports the accuracy of our pretrained models per country. The memory usage and the inference time of each model are reported in the Parser page, and Choose a Model summarizes how to pick a model.
We evaluate our models on two forms of address data
clean data which refers to addresses containing elements from four categories, namely a street name, a municipality, a province and a postal code,
incomplete data which is made up of addresses missing at least one category amongst the aforementioned ones.
The FastText and BPEmb results below come from the 2020 dataset described in the
deepparse-address-data repository (data protocol and
scripts). Its archive, formerly hosted on a GRAAL server, is no longer available for download. Our current address
data is the worldwide-addresses dataset on the
HuggingFace Hub (one configuration per country), also built from the libpostal data; it has no Orientation nor
GeneralDelivery tags.
Clean Data¶
The following table presents the accuracy on the 20 countries (using clean data) we used during training for both our models. Attention mechanisms improve performance by around 0.5% for all countries.
Country |
FastText (%) |
BPEmb (%) |
Country |
FastText (%) |
BPEmb (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Norway |
99.06 |
98.3 |
Austria |
99.21 |
97.82 |
Italy |
99.65 |
98.93 |
Mexico |
99.49 |
98.9 |
United Kingdom |
99.58 |
97.62 |
Switzerland |
98.9 |
98.38 |
Germany |
99.72 |
99.4 |
Denmark |
99.71 |
99.55 |
France |
99.6 |
98.18 |
Brazil |
99.31 |
97.69 |
Netherlands |
99.47 |
99.54 |
Australia |
99.68 |
98.44 |
Poland |
99.64 |
99.52 |
Czechia |
99.48 |
99.03 |
United States |
99.56 |
97.69 |
Canada |
99.76 |
99.03 |
South Korea |
99.97 |
99.99 |
Russia |
98.9 |
96.97 |
Spain |
99.73 |
99.4 |
Finland |
99.77 |
99.76 |
We have also made a zero-shot evaluation of our models using clean data from 41 other countries; the results are shown in the next table.
Country |
FastText (%) |
BPEmb (%) |
Country |
FastText (%) |
BPEmb (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Latvia |
89.29 |
68.31 |
Faroe Islands |
71.22 |
64.74 |
Colombia |
85.96 |
68.09 |
Singapore |
86.03 |
67.19 |
Réunion |
84.3 |
78.65 |
Indonesia |
62.38 |
63.04 |
Japan |
36.26 |
34.97 |
Portugal |
93.09 |
72.01 |
Algeria |
86.32 |
70.59 |
Belgium |
93.14 |
86.06 |
Malaysia |
83.14 |
89.64 |
Ukraine |
93.34 |
89.42 |
Estonia |
87.62 |
70.08 |
Bangladesh |
72.28 |
65.63 |
Slovenia |
89.01 |
83.96 |
Hungary |
51.52 |
37.87 |
Bermuda |
83.19 |
59.16 |
Romania |
90.04 |
82.9 |
Philippines |
63.91 |
57.36 |
Belarus |
93.25 |
78.59 |
Bosnia |
88.54 |
67.46 |
Moldova |
89.22 |
57.48 |
Lithuania |
93.28 |
69.97 |
Paraguay |
96.02 |
87.07 |
Croatia |
95.8 |
81.76 |
Argentina |
81.68 |
71.2 |
Ireland |
80.16 |
54.44 |
Kazakhstan |
89.04 |
76.13 |
Greece |
87.08 |
38.95 |
Bulgaria |
91.16 |
65.76 |
Serbia |
92.87 |
76.79 |
New Caledonia |
94.45 |
94.46 |
Sweden |
73.13 |
86.85 |
Venezuela |
79.23 |
70.88 |
New Zealand |
91.25 |
75.57 |
Iceland |
83.7 |
77.09 |
India |
70.3 |
63.68 |
Uzbekistan |
85.85 |
70.1 |
Cyprus |
89.64 |
89.47 |
Slovakia |
78.34 |
68.96 |
South Africa |
95.68 |
74.829 |
Moreover, we also tested the performance when using attention mechanism to further improve zero-shot performance on those countries; the result are shown in the next table.
Country |
FastText (%) |
FastTextAtt (%) |
BPEmb (%) |
BPEmbAtt (%) |
Country |
FastText (%) |
FastTextAtt (%) |
BPEmb (%) |
BPEmbAtt (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ireland |
80.16 |
89.11 |
54.44 |
81.84 |
Serbia |
92.87 |
95.88 |
76.79 |
91.4 |
Uzbekistan |
85.85 |
87.24 |
70.1 |
76.71 |
Ukraine |
93.34 |
94.58 |
89.42 |
92.65 |
South Africa |
95.68 |
97.25 |
74.82 |
97.95 |
Paraguay |
96.02 |
97.08 |
87.07 |
97.36 |
Greece |
87.08 |
86.04 |
38.95 |
58.79 |
Algeria |
86.32 |
87.3 |
70.59 |
84.56 |
Belarus |
93.25 |
97.4 |
78.59 |
97.49 |
Sweden |
73.13 |
89.24 |
86.85 |
93.53 |
Portugal |
93.09 |
94.92 |
72.01 |
93.76 |
Hungary |
51.52 |
51.08 |
37.87 |
24.48 |
Iceland |
83.7 |
96.54 |
77.09 |
96.63 |
Colombia |
85.96 |
90.08 |
68.09 |
88.52 |
Latvia |
89.29 |
93.14 |
68.31 |
73.79 |
Malaysia |
83.14 |
74.62 |
89.64 |
91.14 |
Bosnia |
88.54 |
87.27 |
67.46 |
89.02 |
India |
70.3 |
75.31 |
63.68 |
80.56 |
Réunion |
84.3 |
97.74 |
78.65 |
94.27 |
Croatia |
95.8 |
95.32 |
81.76 |
85.99 |
Estonia |
87.62 |
88.2 |
70.08 |
77.32 |
New Caledonia |
94.45 |
99.61 |
94.46 |
99.77 |
Japan |
36.26 |
46.91 |
34.97 |
49.48 |
New Zealand |
91.25 |
97.0 |
75.57 |
95.7 |
Singapore |
86.03 |
89.92 |
67.19 |
88.17 |
Romania |
90.04 |
95.38 |
82.9 |
93.41 |
Bangladesh |
72.28 |
78.21 |
65.63 |
77.09 |
Slovakia |
78.34 |
82.29 |
68.96 |
96.0 |
Argentina |
81.68 |
88.59 |
71.2 |
86.8 |
Kazakhstan |
89.04 |
92.37 |
76.13 |
96.08 |
Venezuela |
79.23 |
95.47 |
70.88 |
96.38 |
Indonesia |
62.38 |
66.87 |
63.04 |
71.17 |
Bulgaria |
91.16 |
91.73 |
65.76 |
93.28 |
Cyprus |
89.64 |
97.44 |
89.47 |
98.01 |
Bermuda |
83.19 |
93.25 |
59.16 |
93.8 |
Moldova |
89.22 |
92.07 |
57.48 |
89.08 |
Slovenia |
89.01 |
95.08 |
83.96 |
96.73 |
Lithuania |
93.28 |
87.74 |
69.97 |
78.67 |
Philippines |
63.91 |
81.94 |
57.36 |
83.42 |
Belgium |
93.14 |
90.72 |
86.06 |
89.85 |
Faroe Islands |
71.22 |
73.23 |
64.74 |
85.39 |
Incomplete Data¶
The following table presents the accuracy on the 20 countries we used during training for both our models but for incomplete data. We didn’t test on the other 41 countries since we did not train on them and therefore do not expect to achieve an interesting performance. Attention mechanisms improve performance by around 0.5% for all countries.
Country |
FastText (%) |
BPEmb (%) |
Country |
FastText (%) |
BPEmb (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Norway |
99.52 |
99.75 |
Austria |
99.55 |
98.94 |
Italy |
99.16 |
98.88 |
Mexico |
97.24 |
95.93 |
United Kingdom |
97.85 |
95.2 |
Switzerland |
99.2 |
99.47 |
Germany |
99.41 |
99.38 |
Denmark |
97.86 |
97.9 |
France |
99.51 |
98.49 |
Brazil |
98.96 |
97.12 |
Netherlands |
98.74 |
99.46 |
Australia |
99.34 |
98.7 |
Poland |
99.43 |
99.41 |
Czechia |
98.78 |
98.88 |
United States |
98.49 |
96.5 |
Canada |
98.96 |
96.98 |
South Korea |
91.1 |
99.89 |
Russia |
97.18 |
96.01 |
Spain |
99.07 |
98.35 |
Finland |
99.04 |
99.52 |
Model2Vec Models¶
The Model2Vec models were trained in October 2026 on the worldwide-addresses data of the same 20 countries (100,000 clean and 50,000 incomplete addresses per country), 90% for training and 10% for validation, and tested on a separate test split of the same data (260,000 addresses). The accuracy is the per-word tag accuracy on this test split, so it is not comparable to the per-country accuracy of the tables above.
We trained each model with four hidden sizes (128, 256, 512 and 1024), with and without attention, with five seeds each. The released model of each type is the hidden size with the lowest mean validation loss over the seeds, then the seed with the lowest validation loss, both relative to the mean validation loss of the seed (the seed also draws the validation split). The test accuracy is only reported, never used for the selection.
Model |
Hidden size |
Test accuracy of the released model (%) |
Test accuracy, mean ± std over the seeds (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1024 |
98.73 |
98.04 ± 0.50 (5 seeds) |
|
1024 |
98.42 |
97.89 ± 0.58 (5 seeds) |
|
1024 |
97.95 |
97.78 ± 0.32 (5 seeds) |
|
256 |
98.17 |
97.99 ± 0.29 (5 seeds) |
|
1024 |
98.51 |
97.74 ± 0.72 (5 seeds) |
|
1024 |
98.59 |
97.73 ± 1.04 (5 seeds) |
The whole grid (mean ± standard deviation over the seeds; the released configurations are in bold):
Model |
Hidden size |
Seeds |
Relative validation loss |
Validation loss |
Validation accuracy (%) |
Test accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
128 |
5 |
1.044 ± 0.235 |
1.429 ± 0.581 |
97.46 ± 0.78 |
97.11 ± 0.86 |
|
256 |
5 |
0.957 ± 0.110 |
1.280 ± 0.409 |
97.82 ± 0.38 |
97.51 ± 0.41 |
|
512 |
5 |
0.890 ± 0.077 |
1.169 ± 0.345 |
98.06 ± 0.49 |
97.75 ± 0.56 |
|
1024 |
5 |
0.844 ± 0.147 |
1.168 ± 0.472 |
98.31 ± 0.44 |
98.04 ± 0.50 |
|
128 |
5 |
1.029 ± 0.170 |
1.351 ± 0.437 |
97.97 ± 0.37 |
97.66 ± 0.42 |
|
256 |
5 |
0.960 ± 0.115 |
1.279 ± 0.486 |
97.93 ± 0.51 |
97.61 ± 0.54 |
|
512 |
5 |
1.090 ± 0.152 |
1.436 ± 0.446 |
97.53 ± 0.37 |
97.17 ± 0.41 |
|
1024 |
5 |
0.929 ± 0.078 |
1.227 ± 0.394 |
98.17 ± 0.54 |
97.89 ± 0.58 |
|
128 |
5 |
1.240 ± 0.278 |
1.564 ± 0.293 |
97.12 ± 0.47 |
96.75 ± 0.52 |
|
256 |
5 |
1.037 ± 0.077 |
1.359 ± 0.364 |
97.72 ± 0.16 |
97.40 ± 0.15 |
|
512 |
5 |
0.929 ± 0.263 |
1.264 ± 0.577 |
97.79 ± 0.72 |
97.44 ± 0.83 |
|
1024 |
5 |
0.908 ± 0.257 |
1.146 ± 0.320 |
98.09 ± 0.29 |
97.78 ± 0.32 |
|
128 |
5 |
0.939 ± 0.323 |
1.186 ± 0.423 |
97.66 ± 0.75 |
97.29 ± 0.82 |
|
256 |
5 |
0.810 ± 0.066 |
1.064 ± 0.304 |
98.26 ± 0.26 |
97.99 ± 0.29 |
|
512 |
5 |
1.145 ± 0.467 |
1.553 ± 0.757 |
97.25 ± 1.35 |
96.91 ± 1.41 |
|
1024 |
5 |
1.163 ± 0.341 |
1.441 ± 0.238 |
97.71 ± 0.33 |
97.37 ± 0.37 |
|
128 |
5 |
1.067 ± 0.184 |
1.400 ± 0.501 |
97.72 ± 0.34 |
97.40 ± 0.37 |
|
256 |
5 |
1.051 ± 0.174 |
1.457 ± 0.628 |
97.75 ± 0.59 |
97.42 ± 0.66 |
|
512 |
5 |
1.157 ± 0.203 |
1.598 ± 0.680 |
97.75 ± 0.46 |
97.40 ± 0.48 |
|
1024 |
5 |
0.953 ± 0.207 |
1.315 ± 0.539 |
98.06 ± 0.63 |
97.74 ± 0.72 |
|
128 |
5 |
0.990 ± 0.246 |
1.298 ± 0.533 |
97.79 ± 0.90 |
97.44 ± 0.96 |
|
256 |
5 |
1.046 ± 0.165 |
1.451 ± 0.641 |
97.74 ± 0.79 |
97.39 ± 0.89 |
|
512 |
5 |
0.913 ± 0.287 |
1.301 ± 0.671 |
97.82 ± 0.75 |
97.49 ± 0.83 |
|
1024 |
5 |
0.907 ± 0.233 |
1.261 ± 0.633 |
98.06 ± 0.91 |
97.73 ± 1.04 |
The tables are generated by models_evaluation/select_best_model.py.